beginningboutique:

OMG these shoes!! Get them online @bb.com.au/new

beginningboutique:

OMG these shoes!! Get them online @bb.com.au/new


OPENING CEREMONY OMOTESANDO
OPENING CEREMONY OMOTESANDO
doompants:

whitetears365:

This is a great comeback for all of that “I don’t see race.” BS

First of all, nobody created a social construct for race in and of itself.  Race is just race.  White people, living in the past and in present day, may have “created” a social construct for racism against any number of minority groups of color or creed, but they did not create race itself.  Verbiage is important when making a cogent argument.And the problem isn’t who created rac(e)ism anyway, the problem with the “I don’t see your race” dodge is that it is insulting to ignore the race of another and thereby ignore any particular plight they may have as a result of their race’s history.  It’s an extremely ignorant to say, “I don’t see your race,” despite the best intentions of those who generally espouse that particular axiomatic dodge.TL;DR: Deep down we are all the same creatures, but our histories have a wide divide, and choosing to ignore race is potentially choosing to ignore or simply not acknowledge the individual racial history of a person, which is profound error.

doompants:

whitetears365:

This is a great comeback for all of that “I don’t see race.” BS

First of all, nobody created a social construct for race in and of itself.  Race is just race.  White people, living in the past and in present day, may have “created” a social construct for racism against any number of minority groups of color or creed, but they did not create race itself.  Verbiage is important when making a cogent argument.

And the problem isn’t who created rac(e)ism anyway, the problem with the “I don’t see your race” dodge is that it is insulting to ignore the race of another and thereby ignore any particular plight they may have as a result of their race’s history.  It’s an extremely ignorant to say, “I don’t see your race,” despite the best intentions of those who generally espouse that particular axiomatic dodge.

TL;DR: Deep down we are all the same creatures, but our histories have a wide divide, and choosing to ignore race is potentially choosing to ignore or simply not acknowledge the individual racial history of a person, which is profound error.

mmmsouth:

ろりぽっぷ

mmmsouth:

ろりぽっぷ

kosmonatik2:

Playboy “Bunnies of Missouri” Mary John, 1967

kosmonatik2:

Playboy “Bunnies of Missouri” Mary John, 1967

Even though it might sound harsh and impolitic, here is the bottom line: if you don’t want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you. Don’t argue with me, don’t call me names, don’t tell me that I can’t stop you, don’t say I’m a racist pig, don’t threaten that you’ll sue me and take away my badge. Don’t scream at me that you pay my salary, and don’t even think of aggressively walking towards me. Most field stops are complete in minutes. How difficult is it to cooperate for that long?

LAPD officer Sunil Dutta, writing 100% seriously in a WaPo op-ed entitled (I kid you not) “I’m a cop. If you don’t want to get hurt, don’t challenge me.” (via hipsterlibertarian)

The sense of entitled, sadistic, “moral disengagement” by the police is truly disheartening. How can they build trust in a community they are using for their role-playing FPS fantasies?

(via liberalsarecool)

He basically said:

"Give up your rights as a citizen, civilian, and human being when dealing with me, and I might let you live.”

(via sonofbaldwin)

unomoralez:

fuck

I cry every time

liein:

50nnym00r3:

that’s it that’s the winner

liein:

50nnym00r3:

that’s it that’s the winner

image

teachytv:

when ur enemy makes the mistake of thinking shes the only one who can turn into a car

image